Tracking and analyzing conversion rates as a content performance metric involves several steps

Tracking and analyzing conversion rates as a content performance metric involves several steps:

  1. Define Conversion Goals: First, you need to define what a ‘conversion’ means for your specific content. It could be a product purchase, a newsletter sign-up, a download of a white paper, or any other action that you want your audience to take1.

  2. Set Up Tracking: You can set up a system for tracking conversion rates with the help of tools like Google Analytics and AdWords2. These tools collect large amounts of raw data, so it’s important to set filters so you can focus on specific data sets related to your goals2.

  3. Analyze Individual Content Pieces: Some of your articles are better at converting visitors than others. Calculate the conversion rate from visitor to subscriber for each of your articles to know exactly which posts to promote1.

  4. Track Social Media Performance: Digital marketers can also use conversion metrics to track content performance on social media. You can add social sharing buttons on your web pages and check their counters, or check your social media analytics pages for insights3.

  5. Measure and Adjust: Regularly measure your conversion rates and adjust your content strategy accordingly. If a piece of content is not leading to conversions, it may need to be tweaked or replaced1.

Remember, improving your lead conversion rate is no simple task, but your content can help get you there1.

Tim Moseley

The gold market needs another catalyst to drive ETF inflows for stainable higher prices

The gold market needs another catalyst to drive ETF inflows for stainable higher prices

While October was a historic month for the gold market as the precious metal saw a record-high closing price for the month, more is needed to create a sustainable bid in the marketplace, according to analysts at the World Gold Council.

In October, gold prices rallied nearly 7%, closing out the month at $1,997 an ounce. Since then, the precious metal has struggled to hold its ground at around $2,000 an ounce. December gold futures last traded at $1,974 an ounce, down 0.73% on the day.

In their latest monthly commentary, analysts at the World Gold Council noted that while geopolitical uncertainty due to the conflict between Israel and Hamas drove speculative safe-haven demand higher, long-term investors are still reluctant to jump into the market according to weak price action in gold-backed exchange-traded products (ETFs).

“A sustained rally in gold will, in our view, require either continued or worsening political risk, a peak in bond yields and the US dollar, or an equity bear market combined with revived recession risks,” the analysts said.

Although the gold market needs another catalyst for a sustainable rally above $2,000 an ounce, October’s price action does show how much potential the gold market has as sentiment continues to shift.

“COMEX net shorts reversals are a historically reliable positive signal for gold prices and have tended to lead ETF flows,” the analysts said. “It is possible that with a full house of investment behind it, including ETFs and futures, gold could break out of the broad range in which it has traded since the middle of 2020.”

The weakest pillar in the gold market remains investment demand in gold-backed ETFs; however, the WGC said that October flows could signal a bottom in the market.

Although the gold market saw its fifth consecutive month of outflows, the pace was a lot slower compared to September. The WGC said 37 tonnes of gold, valued at $2 billion, flowed out of global gold-backed ETFs last month.

However, the WGC noted that assets under management increased by 6% due to gold’s rally last month.

Year to date, holdings in gold-backed ETFs have dropped by 225 tonnes, valued at $13 billion.

According to analysts at the WGC, the Federal Reserve’s restrictive monetary policy remains a critical factor for gold as outflows in North American markets led the broader trend.

According to the WGC, North American-listed funds saw outflows of 27.5 tonnes, valued at $1.5 billion.

“Surging Treasury yields, the opportunity cost of holding gold, early October overshadowed safe-haven demand from geopolitical risk and equity volatility later in the month. With the economy performing surprisingly well and inflation remaining sticky, the 10-year US Treasury yield touched 5% during the month –the first time since July 2007,” the analysts said.

Across the Atlantic, the WGC said that European-listed funds saw outflows of 11 tonnes, valued at $622 million.

“We believe stabilizing yields, as the European Central Bank (ECB) paused its ten-month rate hiking spree and the region’s inflationary pressure continued to slide, geopolitical risks and the rising gold price helped limit losses,” the analysts said.

Asian markets, which have been a pillar of strength in global ETFs, saw inflows of 1 tonne, valued at $81 million.

“Between January and October, Asia funds attracted US$1bn (+15t), the only region experiencing positive flows, mainly driven by China and Japan,” the analysts said.

Finally, other markets, led by Turkey, also saw inflows of 1 tonne.

As to what turns the tide for gold, the WGC said that investors might need to see lower equity markets to spur renewed interest in the precious metal.

“Earnings projections remain quite rosy, but prices, particularly the Nasdaq, are rolling over. The index is down more than 10% already from its mid-year peak during what is supposedly the seasonally strongest period. A greater than 20% drop from the peak – a ‘bear market’ – could spur additional interest in gold from investors, concerned perhaps that equity dips are no longer worth buying,” the analysts said.

  China continues to dominate the gold market with a 12-month buying spree, adding 23 tonnes in October

By

Neils Christensen

For Kitco News

Time to Buy Gold and Silver

Tim Moseley

Better risk appetite limits buying interest in gold silver

Better risk appetite limits buying interest in gold, silver

Gold and silver prices are weaker in midday U.S. trading Monday. The safe-haven metals are seeing some downside price pressure as trader and investor risk appetite has up-ticked modestly recently, as seen by last week's solid rally in the U.S. stock indexes. December gold was last down $8.10 at $1,991.10. December silver was last down $0.06 at $23.225.

Hey, if you have not done so, I strongly encourage you to try out my “Markets Front Burner” email report. It's my best writing and analysis, I think, because I get to look ahead at the marketplace and do some market price forecasting. And it's free! It's a weekly email report that comes right to year email box. Sign up to my new, free weekly Markets Front Burner newsletter.

U.S. stock indexes are slightly up at midday after posting solid gains last week—the best weekly gains of the year. There have been no major, unexpected developments, markets-wise, on the Israel-Hamas war front for some time—namely other countries getting seriously involved in the conflict. That has lifted marketplace spirits a bit and has allowed traders and investors to focus on and react to more normal market fundamentals. That's also pulling safe-haven bidding away from the gold and silver markets—at least right now.

In overnight news, Bank of Japan governor Ueda said the BOJ will continue its monetary policy easing and yield-curve control policy. He also said he did not think the Japanese government 10-year note yield would stay significantly above 1.0%. That compares to the U.S. Treasury 10-year note yield of around 4.5%. Ueda's comments were music to the ears of the foreign exchange and financial markets traders who are and have been executing the U.S.-Japan interest rate differential or “carry” trades.

  Hedge funds losing interest in gold as the market searches for a new catalyst

The key outside markets today see the U.S. dollar index slightly higher. Nymex crude oil prices are higher and trading around $82.00 a barrel. The yield on the benchmark U.S. Treasury 10-year note is presently fetching 4.643%.

Technically, December gold futures bulls have the overall near-term technical advantage. Prices are in a four-week-old uptrend on the daily bar chart. Bulls' next upside price objective is to produce a close above solid resistance at $2,050.00. Bears' next near-term downside price objective is pushing futures prices below solid technical support at $1,950.00. First resistance is seen at $2,000.00 and then at $2,010.00. First support is seen at last week's low of $1,978.20 and then at $1,964.60. Wyckoff's Market Rating: 6.0.

December silver futures bulls have the slight overall near-term technical advantage. Silver bulls' next upside price objective is closing prices above solid technical resistance at $24.05. The next downside price objective for the bears is closing prices below solid support at $22.00. First resistance is seen at $23.50 and then at the October high of $23.88. Next support is seen at $23.00 and then at last week's low of $22.565. Wyckoff's Market Rating: 5.5.

December N.Y. copper closed up 37 points at 371.85 cents today. Prices closed near the session high and hit a four-week-high. The copper bears still have the overall near-term technical advantage. However, fledgling price uptrend is in place on the daily bar chart. Copper bulls' next upside price objective is pushing and closing prices above solid technical resistance at 385.00 cents. The next downside price objective for the bears is closing prices below solid technical support at the October low of 351.95 cents. First resistance is seen at today's high of 372.55 cents and then at 375.00 cents. First support is seen at today's low of 366.65 cents and then at last week's low of 363.15 cents. Wyckoff's Market Rating: 3.5.

By

Jim Wyckoff

For Kitco News

Time to Buy Gold and Silver

Tim Moseley

Gold lacks the juice to break through 2000 this week but analysts don’t recommend shorting it

Gold lacks the juice to break through $2,000 this week, but analysts don't recommend shorting it

Gold’s inability to convincingly break above $2,000 an ounce is creating some cautious sentiment in the marketplace, with some analysts saying that prices might need to consolidate in the near term before the precious metal takes a run at its all-time highs.

While analysts are not looking to short gold in the environment, some have said its price action is disappointing as gold has not benefited from a sharp drop in yields and weakness in the U.S. dollar.

 

Currently, at $1,999, gold has ended a three-week winning streak as it looks to close the week roughly unchanged from last Friday. However, prices are down nearly 1% from its opening gap at the start of the week.

Commodity analysts have said that gold continues to be driven by global geopolitical factors as waning fear in the marketplace takes its toll on the precious metal’s safe-haven allure. Although Israel’s war with Hamas continues to rage, the conflict remains within Gaza, keeping the ongoing chaos in the Middle East in check.

"The geopolitical crisis that has fueled gold’s rally is becoming exhausted,” said Christopher Vecchio.

Vecchio said that while a geopolitical event can provide the gold market with tradeable momentum, it does nothing to attract long-term investors. He noted that a gold rally based on a specific geopolitical event needs to see constant escalation to maintain its safe-haven bid.

Vecchio said he exited his gold position last week and will remain on the sidelines in the near-term as he expects prices to consolidate.

"The bulk of gold’s big move is done. But I would not want to short gold as the fundamental backdrop of a weaker dollar and lower bond yields are positive for gold,” he said. "I think gold can continue to grind higher, but it will be a frustrating grind for potential traders.”

David Morrison, senior market analyst at Trade Nation, described gold as a market that is in search of a new catalyst.

Ole Hansen, head of commodity strategy at Saxo Bank, said that he is neutral on gold; he also noted that a consolidation around current levels would be healthy. The neutral outlook comes after gold saw a nearly 7% rally in October, its best monthly performance since March.

"Gold has paused after rallying almost 200 dollars last month after profit-taking emerged once again above $2,000 per ounce. Having rallied so hard in a short space of time, the market needs consolidating, but so far, the correction has been relatively shallow, with support appearing at $1,953, ahead of $1,933, the 200-day moving average and 38.2% retracement of the mentioned rally,” said Hansen.

On the downside, Hansen said that gold prices would have to fall back to $1,900 an ounce to put this new uptrend at risk.

With little economic data on the docket next week, analysts have said investors will continue to digest the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy decision.

  The Fed's monetary policy is irrelevant and won't stop gold's push above $2,000 – abrdn's Robert Minter

Although the U.S. central bank left interest rates unchanged for the second consecutive time in this tightening cycle, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell maintained his tightening bias.

"Is monetary policy restrictive enough to bring inflation down to 2%? That is what we are asking ourselves," said Powell in his press conference following the monetary policy decision.

"The Fed has left the door open to another rate hike. Even though we are confident that interest rates have already peaked, market participants are nonetheless likely to remain cautious in this respect. Assuming there is no further escalation in the Middle East, the upside potential for the gold price will probably be severely limited,” said Barbara Lambrecht, commodity analyst at Commerzbank.

Markets will get a chance to hear more from Powell as he participates in a panel discussion on "Monetary Challenges in a Global Economy" at a conference in Washington.

The only major economic report to be released next week will be the University of Michigan’s preliminary consumer sentiment survey.

Last month’s revision to the survey surprised markets as one-year consumer inflation expectations rose 4.2%. Powell, during his press conference, dismissed the reading, saying it was an outlier and most consumer surveys show inflation expectations remain "well anchored.”

Next week’s data

Monday: Reserve Bank of Australia monetary policy decision

Thursday: Weekly U.S. unemployment claims; Powell participates in a panel discussion

Friday: University of Michigan preliminary consumer sentiment

By

Neils Christensen

For Kitco News

Time to Buy Gold and Silver

Tim Moseley

Both the SEC and the defense request a summary judgment in lawsuit against Terraform Labs and Do Kwon

Both the SEC and the defense request a summary judgment in lawsuit against Terraform Labs and Do Kwon

With justice served for one of the “crypto villains” of 2022 – Sam Bankman-Fried – the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is looking to speed up the process for the other major villain of 2022, Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon.

In May 2022, the $45 billion Terra ecosystem collapsed after its TerraUSD (UST) algorithmic stablecoin lost its U.S. dollar peg. In February, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Terraform Labs and Do Kwon, charging them with securities fraud.

According to a document filed with the courts on Oct. 27, the SEC has asked the judge presiding over the case to make a summary judgment on the claims without a full trial.

“Terraform and Kwon orchestrated a fraudulent scheme that ultimately led to $45 billion in market loss, including devastating losses for U.S. investors,” the filing said. “Defendants fabricated Terra blockchain activity to create the appearance of real-world transactions on the blockchain that did not exist. And they lied to investors about the stability of Terraform’s so-called stablecoin, while concealing the secret deal Defendants had entered into with a third party to save the asset from collapse. When this scheme unraveled, investors in Terraform’s crypto asset securities lost nearly everything.”

“In addition to defrauding investors, Defendants engaged in unregistered public offerings of certain of their crypto-asset securities,” the SEC added. “Defendants distributed LUNA and MIR to intermediaries that were expected to, and did, resell those securities into public trading markets accessible to investors in the U.S.”

“As set forth below and in the SEC’s Statement of Undisputed Material Facts Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 56.1, the evidence that establishes Defendants’ violations is clear, undisputed, and overwhelming,” they said. “The Court should grant summary judgment in the SEC’s favor.”

The filing included more than 45 pages outlining the evidence and arguments against Terraform Labs and Kwon as the SEC made its case for summary judgment.

“Summary judgment is appropriate when the record shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law,” the SEC said, citing Case v. City of New York. “If the moving party meets its initial burden, the burden then shifts to the opposing party to establish a genuine dispute of material fact.”

The SEC presented evidence showing that “Terraform repeatedly violated the Exchange Act” by making “numerous material misrepresentations in statements to investors and potential investors” regarding the depeg of the stablecoin TerraUSD, “and engaged in other deceptive conduct, including causing ‘fake transactions’ to be put on the Terra blockchain.”

“Second, the undisputed record shows that Kwon – as the founder, CEO, and majority shareholder of 92% of Terraform – had the ‘power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of’ Terraform,” they said. “Kwon admitted that he had ultimate authority for decisions at Terraform.”

“Third, Kwon was a culpable participant in Terraform’s deceptive conduct and misrepresentations,” they alleged. “In fact, he was the genesis of that conduct and he repeatedly used Terraform to advance his schemes. Kwon conceived and directed the plan to ‘fake transactions’ on Terraform’s blockchain and then falsely represented them as real.”

“Kwon personally negotiated the deal with [redacted] in May 2021 to restore the peg, and then misrepresented to the public that the algorithm had ‘automatically self-heal[ed]’ the peg,” they said. “At the same time, Kwon directed Terraform employees to omit that information from public statements.”

“No rational jury could conclude that Kwon was not liable for Terraform’s violations of Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder pursuant to Exchange Act Section 20(a),” the SEC argued. “For the foregoing reasons, summary judgment is warranted against Defendants Terraform and Kwon on all of the SEC’s claims.”

  The Kwon Identity: Fugitive Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon arrested using fake papers in Montenegro

In an opposing filing from Kwon’s defense team, his lawyers also asked for a summary judgment on the case, arguing that the judge should reject the SEC’s lawsuit, claiming it has failed to prove he or his firm did anything wrong.

“After two years of investigation, the completion of a discovery period that resulted in the taking of more than 20 depositions, and the exchange of over two million pages of documents and data, the SEC is evidentiarily no closer to proving that the Defendants did anything wrong,” the lawyers wrote.

“Indeed, with the close of fact and expert discovery, the deficiencies in the SEC’s case have gotten worse, as it is now apparent that admissible evidence does not exist to support many of the SEC’s claims and that the SEC knew some of its allegations were false when it filed the Amended Complaint,” they said. “It is evident that the SEC’s preferred witnesses have trafficked in rumor and innuendo about the Defendants, but few, if any, have any firsthand knowledge about anything relevant to this case.”

Kwon’s lawyers provided 35 pages of arguments backing their motion for a summary judgment, and concluded that, “For all the foregoing reasons, the Court should grant summary judgment in its entirety with prejudice.”

Both motions for summary judgment are now in the hands of the presiding judge and will be ruled on in the near future. Kwon is currently detained in Montenegro and has previously asked the court to reject the SEC’s motion to extradite and interview him in the United States.

By

Jordan Finneseth

For Kitco News

Time to Buy Gold and Silver

Tim Moseley

Gold Price News: Gold Falls for Third Day Ahead of Fed Rate Decision

Gold Price News: Gold Falls for Third Day Ahead of Fed Rate Decision

Gold is down for its third consecutive day with the precious metal now trading comfortably below $2,000 an ounce.

While safe haven demand continues to be strong amid Israel’s ongoing attacks on Gaza, today also brings the latest Federal Reserve interest rate announcement that will provide a reminder of the “higher for longer” stance of central banks.

gold kau price on kinesis exchange

Gold ($/g) price – 3-month view – from Kinesis Exchange

As a result, even though gold has dipped slightly from the highs achieved at the end of October, the price remains at a very high level historically with the recent movement more reflective of a slight correction rather than a broader downward trend.

Today’s Fed rate decision is widely expected to see the US central bank keep its rate unchanged at 5.5% but while rates may not rise further, the prospect of any cut in the coming months looks remote. As such, gold will have to face this permanent headwind of high-interest rates, making the non-yield-bearing asset less attractive.

While the peak of gold above $2,000 an ounce may have passed for now, the precious metal is unlikely to slide much further before fresh support rushes in.

Time to Buy Gold and Silver

Tim Moseley

Bitcoin price whipsaws on Fed rate decision reclaims support above 34600

Bitcoin price whipsaws on Fed rate decision, reclaims support above $34,600

The broader crypto market experienced a slight uptrend in trading on Wednesday after the Federal Reserve announced that it would be holding interest rates steady in a range of 5.25%-5.5%, the highest level in 22 years.

While rates remain unchanged for the time being, the central bank left the door open for future increases as they work to bring inflation back to their 2% target. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said the committee “is proceeding carefully” and will continue to make decisions “meeting by meeting.”

Stocks climbed higher following the announcement as traders saw the pause as evidence that the risk-on environment has returned. At the close of markets, the S&P, Dow, and Nasdaq finished in the green, up 1.05%, 0.65%, and 1.43%, respectively. Treasury yields sank lower, with the 10-year yield trading around 4.755%

Data provided by TradingView shows that Bitcoin’s (BTC) price whipsawed near midday, spiking to a high of $35,200 before dipping to $34,080. The top crypto has since climbed back above support at $34,600.

BTC/USD Chart by TradingView

Senior Kitco technical analyst Jim Wyckoff noted that “November Bitcoin futures prices [were] a bit weaker in early U.S. trading Wednesday,” and said, “Recent price action has formed a bullish pennant pattern on the daily bar chart.”

Bitcoin futures 1-day chart. Source: Kitco

“However, prices need to see a bullish upside breakout this week, or the bullish pennant will be negated,” Wyckoff warned. “The BTC bulls still have the solid near-term technical advantage as a price uptrend is in place on the daily bar chart.”

MN Trading analyst Gunter Lackmann said the daily chart for Bitcoin shows its price is “in a bullish consolidation resembling an ascending triangle chart pattern as the 8EMA, a reliable source to look for relative strength, is catching up with price.”

BTC/USD 1-day chart. Source: MN Trading

“Currently, the most obvious invalidation of this pattern would be daily candle closes under $34k, but we should also be ready for an intraday retest of the 8EMA, which last got tagged on October 23,” he said. “Upside resistance is at around $34.8k.”

Zooming in on the 1-hour chart, Lackmann said there is a “clear consolidation pattern, especially focused between $34,240 – 34,760.”

BTC/USD 1-hour chart. Source: MN Trading

He said the “most preferable entry into long exposure here probably would be a raid of the range low ($32.2k) followed by a reclaim of the range.”

“Most conservative traders wait until after the move to the upside (often divided into two – three legs up) completes” to reenter the market, he said. “My targets for those potential legs up from here are the areas of $36 – 38k and $40 – 42k. From there, it will become more likely that we get a retest of the previous HTF range high of around $31.5k, just when the market gets excited for more upside.”

For traders waiting for a significant pullback before opening a position in Bitcoin, market analyst Rekt Captial warned that there are only 100 days left when such an opportunity could present itself.

Altcoins in an uptrend

A majority of tokens in the top 200 recorded gains on Wednesday, while only nine coins saw losses greater than 3%.

Daily cryptocurrency market performance. Source: Coin360

SushiSwap (SUSHI) was the top performer, with an increase of 46.4%, followed by a gain of 26.8% for Just (JUST), and 16.3% for Uniswap (UNI). Polymesh (POLYX) led the losers with a decline of 11.64%, while MobileCoin (MOB) lost 10.5%, and Centrifuge (CFG) fell by 9%.

The overall cryptocurrency market cap now stands at $1.29 trillion, and Bitcoin’s dominance rate is 52.4%.

By

Jordan Finneseth

For Kitco News

Time to Buy Gold and Silver

Tim Moseley

The Power Dynamics of A Global Economy: Who Is Ultimately Pulling The Strings?

The Power Dynamics of A Global Economy: Who Is Ultimately Pulling The Strings? 

The question of who controls the global economy can vary depending on one's viewpoint. Some may argue that Mega Banks such as JP Morgan, asset managers like Black Rock, tech giants like Microsoft, or international organizations like the World Economic Forum hold significant influence. However, there is an overarching entity that surpasses these institutions. It is worth noting that these entities share common goals and interests, such as Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), Digital IDs, and Smart Cities. This alignment is not a mere coincidence.

In this article, we will uncover the true power behind the world's most influential institutions. Surprisingly, it is the United Nations that is orchestrating it all. There seems to be a pattern, so it’s worth investigating as to whether it is the UN pulling the strings. We embark on an eye-opening journey through the hidden depths of global control, where the United Nations takes on the role of puppet master, manipulating events to carry out their sinister agenda. The United Nations presents itself as a symbol of peace and collaboration, but what lies beneath its admirable facade? 

We will delve into the history and purpose of the UN, exploring its origins and transformation into a powerful force with evil intentions. Brace yourself as the manipulation tactics the UN employs, from secret agreements to strategic alliances, are exposed. They have become masters at pulling strings and subtly guiding governments toward their desired goals. 


Image Source: Defenseindepth.co

The Historical Roots

In the early 19th century, a series of relentless wars and conflicts had a profound impact on the global economy. In the aftermath of the Napoleonic Wars, prominent European nations made a concerted effort to establish a prolonged period of peace. This initiative culminated in the creation of the Concert of Europe in 1815, an unprecedented international organization dedicated to preventing member states from engaging in armed conflict. Despite its noble intentions, the Concert of Europe ultimately failed to maintain peace, succumbing to the pressures that led to the outbreak of World War I in 1914.

However, a previous example has been established. Following the war's conclusion in 1918, the authorities decided to once again pursue a period of tranquility with the League of Nations in 1920. What set this attempt apart was that the League of Nations encompassed multiple objectives beyond averting war. Many of these objectives were centered around human rights, including matters such as working conditions. Unfortunately, the League of Nations did not endure as long as its forerunner. It disintegrated when the Second World War commenced in 1939, less than two decades later.

However, the third attempt was more successful. By the conclusion of World War II in 1945, the UN had been established with great efficiency, although its official foundation came a month later. Like its precursors, the UN emerged from the initiative of the ruling nations, of which there were 50 at the time. Nowadays, the UN encompasses practically every country worldwide, comprising 193 nations.

Similar to the League of Nations, the main objective of the United Nations was to maintain peace. Nevertheless, its initial Charter encompassed an extensive range of additional aims to keep member nations engaged. These objectives comprised not only humanitarian endeavors but also the promotion of global collaboration on various other worldwide concerns.

The crux of the matter is that if you purport to have concerns that affect the entire world, then it follows that you must also advocate for solutions that can address these issues on a global scale. However, the only way to achieve such universal solutions is by establishing a unified global authority, which is what the United Nations represents. This logical progression implies that a single global currency and military, among other things, would also be necessary.

In 1948, the United Nations formed its military branch shortly after its establishment. The UN's first peacekeeping mission took place in 1956. Following the end of the Cold War in 1988, the UN's military role evolved to encompass not only controlling tensions within countries but also regulating the population. Notably, the UN recently announced plans to extend its peacekeeping efforts to social media by creating a so-called digital army, which will combat misinformation and disinformation.

At this point, it should be clear that this refers to content those in authority disapprove of. The announcement explicitly mentions that the United Nations' online force will also address any data that hinders the advancement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

For those unfamiliar, the SDGs encompass 17 objectives that every member nation is required to achieve by 2030. It is the reason why countries are hurrying to introduce digital IDs, Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), and smart cities. The SDGs dictate the adoption of these dystopian technologies by 2030, only seven years away. With time running out, the UN and its associated organizations are striving to expedite their implementation.

The question arises as to who has control over the United Nations. In order to provide an answer, it is necessary to comprehend the functioning of the UN. As the UN is commonly known as an international organization, its different divisions are often called organs. The UN is composed of six organs, namely the General Assembly, the Security Council, the Economic and Social Council, the Secretariat, the International Court of Justice, and the Trusteeship Council.


Image source: Blogger

The Roles Of The Six Organs 

There’s not much worth noting about the International Court of Justice except that it’s the sole United Nations entity not headquartered in New York City. Regarding the Trusteeship Council, its purpose was to facilitate the attainment of sovereignty for nations, but it ceased operations in 1994. 

In any case, the United Nations General Assembly comprises 193 member nations. Representatives from these countries convene annually in September to engage in deliberations and voting on resolutions. Resolutions of great importance necessitate a 2/3 majority approval, while less significant resolutions require a simple majority (over 50%). 

Moving on to the Security Council, it consists of 15 countries, with five permanent members and ten rotating members who change every two years. The permanent members are France, Russia, China, the United States, and the United Kingdom, which were the victorious nations of the Second World War.

The United Nations Security Council's five permanent members hold the authority to veto significant resolutions, a contentious issue because it enables these countries to dismiss any UN decisions that negatively impact them. Although Russia's use of veto power has garnered significant attention, it was the United States that insisted on veto power in exchange for its membership in the UN. It is believed that the veto will remain an integral part of the Security Council, as removing it would require the United States and its allies to relinquish their own veto power.


Image Source: Statista 

It is essential to be aware that the United States attempted to obtain a resolution from the United Nations to justify its invasion of Iraq following the 9/11 attacks. Despite the rejection of this resolution by the United Nations, the US proceeded with the invasion anyway, contributing to a complex and controversial struggle for dominance on the global stage, with no party emerging untainted from the conflict.

The United Nations' administrative organ, the Secretariat, plays a crucial role in the creation, passage, and enforcement of UN resolutions. The leader of the Secretariat, known as the Secretary-General, is selected by the Security Council and elected by the General Assembly for a five-year term. Interestingly, while there's no limit on the number of terms a Secretary-General can serve, none have stayed in office for more than two terms – yet.

However, the past records of selecting Secretariat officials expose the individuals in control. It appears that the UN underwent a significant transformation in the early 1990s. It is important to note that the approval of resolutions necessitates a 2/3 majority vote or a simple majority vote. It should be clarified that every member nation holds an equal vote in this procedure, regardless of their contribution level to the UN.

The implications of this go beyond what you might initially think. The country with the most sway over other nations can effectively control the United Nations, which has major consequences. In the 1990s, it seemed like the developing world was gaining momentum, and the US and its allies were not pleased with this shift in power dynamics.

During the early 1990s, the United Nations Secretary-General was Boutros Boutros-Ghali, a representative from Egypt. However, the United States strongly opposed his leadership and went so far as to offer him a nonprofit foundation in exchange for his resignation. Despite the offer, Boutros-Ghali refused to resign and was subsequently denied a second term (vetoed by the US) even though most member countries had supported his return. Since then, the United States has exerted significant influence over the selection of subsequent Secretary-Generals, ensuring that they have been aligned with American interests.

Kofi Annan, a Ghanaian diplomat, succeeded Boutros-Ghali. He also introduced the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) before the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were established. Notably, he drafted the original letter that spawned the concept of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing in 2004. Interestingly, the SDGs heavily influenced the criteria for ESG. Moreover, Antonio Guterres, the current Secretary-General from Portugal, actively promotes the SDGs. He has played a crucial role in advocating for digital IDs, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), and smart cities.

Unelected and unaccountable international organizations advocating for the interests of both private and public sectors, including large corporations and governments, are driving the development of these dystopian technologies. For example, the World Economic Forum (WEF) collaborated with the UN to expedite the adoption of its Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) using Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) measures in 2019. Additionally, entities such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, operating under the UN umbrella, represent the public sector's involvement in these efforts.

In organizations such as the WEF, there are influential financial institutions like Bank of America and investment managers like BlackRock who oversee the allocation of funds, making sure that individuals and institutions adhering to ESG principles receive the necessary financing to support the achievement of the SDGs. Additionally, technology companies like Microsoft play a crucial role in developing critical technologies for this purpose.

The World Economic Forum aims to shape the public sector through initiatives like the Young Global Leaders, which identifies and develops future leaders of nations, and Global Shapers, which focuses on cultivating local leaders, including mayors. Additionally, institutions like the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank offer loan programs to developing countries with favorable terms, provided they align with the Sustainable Development Goals and US interests.

Organizations such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) have also had a significant impact in this area. Likewise, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) aims to influence the private sector by implementing regulations that lead to centralized systems in developed nations and corrupt leadership in developing nations. This enables developed countries to maintain control over their own populations and also manipulate developing countries. Consequently, very few developing nations have been able to transition into developed nations in the past fifty years.

The current state of affairs has left much to be desired for most of the United Nations member states. Over the past few decades, numerous leaders have taken to the podium at the UN's General Assembly to express their opinions. One of the most notable figures to do so was former Libyan Prime Minister Muammar Gaddafi, who delivered a lengthy and impassioned speech that lasted over 90 minutes in 2008 and even included a dramatic moment where he tore a page from a copy of the UN Charter.


Screenshot: Muammar Gaddafi's speech at the United Nations General Assembly

Since 2011, Libya and North Africa have been in turmoil following the assassination of Gaddafi, allegedly orchestrated by US interests. Hillary Clinton's infamous quote, "We came, we saw, he died," references this event. Considering Gaddafi's demise, it is unsurprising that UN countries have been cautious about challenging the United States. However, this has not prevented other leaders from expressing their views, although they have become more careful in doing so. 

Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin are particularly notable examples. In recent years, they have refrained from personally attending the UN's annual assemblies, choosing instead to send their top diplomats. The last time they physically addressed the UN's General Assembly was as far back as 2015. Strangely, their speeches appear absent from the UN's YouTube channel, as if they have been deleted.


Image source: United Nations

Covert Operations of the United Nations

NGOs and education systems often work closely with the UN, assisting in various initiatives. These organizations, while seemingly well-intentioned, have a significant presence in society, including our education systems, where they aim to convey their message. It's as if they are gradually influencing how we learn, one classroom at a time. They cover topics like identity politics and climate change, potentially shaping the minds of young learners.

If you look closer at the materials they produce, you might find that they emphasize what to think rather than how to think critically. This raises questions about independent thought when a collective "woke" mindset is seemingly imposed.

The UN has become a master of manipulation, employing a wide array of tactics to advance its agenda discreetly. Behind their polished image, they offer promises of global harmony while quietly working to shape the world to their liking. But how exactly do they pull off this elaborate act? Well, they've honed the craft of charm, coercion, and cleverly concealed power plays. These manipulation tactics are carefully designed to ensure their agenda remains unchallenged.

One of their most favored tactics involves using funding as a strategic weapon. Governments that align with the UN's objectives receive financial aid and international support as a reward. Conversely, those who dare to question the UN's motives may be cut off from vital resources and isolated diplomatically. Their influence extends far and wide, infiltrating and subverting national sovereignty through a web of alliances, treaties, and agreements.

Countries are entangled in a complex web of obligations and dependencies, often unable to make decisions without considering the UN's interests. It's like a colossal chessboard, with the UN skillfully moving the pieces while governments scramble to stay in their good graces. They strategically cozy up to key players and cultivate a network of loyal followers, all while maintaining a facade of impartiality and neutrality.
As for the governments under the UN's influence, the list is extensive, encompassing both developed and developing nations. From superpowers like the United States to smaller countries striving for independence, no one is immune to the UN's puppeteering. How does this connect to the UN's broader agenda? Well, fasten your seatbelt because it's quite a journey. Their ultimate goal is nothing less than global domination, albeit subtly and inconspicuously.

Population control stands out as one of their key strategies. Under the guise of family planning and reproductive health, they promote policies that restrict individual freedom and interfere with personal choices. This is a clever means to manipulate demographics and ensure their vision of a controlled world becomes a reality. But their agenda doesn't stop there. 

Economic manipulation is another tool in their arsenal. By concentrating power and widening the wealth gap, they create a world where a select few hold all the cards, perpetuating the cycle of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer.

Climate change has also become a convenient crisis for the UN's objectives. They exploit the fear and concern surrounding environmental issues to push for global regulations and policies. While protecting the planet is undeniably important, it's hard to ignore that the UN leverages it as a tool to advance its agenda of centralized control. And let's not forget about global governance. By eroding national sovereignty and promoting the idea of a new world order, they aim to establish a system where the UN reigns supreme.

But what about freedom of speech and independent media? Well, they might as well be a thing of the past. The UN's influence on media and its inclination for censorship and control directly threaten the fundamental principles of democracy. They dictate what information is disseminated, effectively molding public opinion to align with their agenda. It's as if George Orwell's "1984" has never felt more relevant.

Now, who are the puppeteers behind this grand operation? At the forefront is the Secretary-General, the face of authority but perhaps just another puppet dancing to the UN's tune. Then there's the General Assembly, which should serve as a voice for all but often acts as a rubber stamp for the UN's decisions. And let's not overlook the Security Council, supposedly a protector of nations but frequently serving the UN's interests instead. Behind closed doors, the real power lies within the Secretariat, an intricate web of bureaucrats and administrators who make the strings dance to the UN's tune.

Furthermore, the UN employs the tactics of infiltration and indoctrination as part of its core strategies. They infiltrate non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and educational systems, subtly spreading their ideology and molding minds to align with their vision. It's like a slow and steady form of brainwashing, with the UN orchestrating the process. Then there's Agenda 2030 and beyond. It may sound harmless, a plan for global development and sustainability, but upon closer examination, it reveals itself as a blueprint for control and manipulation.

Manufacturing crises are another tactic in the UN's extensive toolbox. From conflicts to humanitarian disasters, they exploit these situations to push their agenda and gain more control. It's akin to a dark and twisted chess game where innocent lives are treated as mere pawns. And we must not underestimate the UN's ability to employ treaties and conventions as instruments of global influence. They effectively legalize control, disguising it as international law. By manipulating these agreements, they can override national sovereignty and dictate the terms of international relations.

Conclusion

The United Nations is often portrayed as the world's saviors, but behind the scenes, they are the puppet masters, orchestrating the actions of institutions and governments to further their agendas, sometimes controversial objectives.

In this exploration, I've uncovered a world where appearances can be deceiving. It's a world where institutions and governments may find themselves unwittingly influenced by the UN's behind-the-scenes maneuvers. Our journey has taken us through the UN's history, its manipulation strategies, and the influential individuals who play a role in its intricate web of global influence.

The key takeaway here is that knowledge is power. By understanding the UN's tactics and strategies, we can liberate ourselves from potential manipulation and contribute to a world characterized by genuine freedom and sovereignty. It's time to shed light on the puppeteers and reclaim control over our destinies. If you once considered this article a mere conspiracy theory, it might be time to reassess. Reality often surpasses the strangest fiction. So, it's vital to stay vigilant, question the status quo, and remember that the United Nations' actions are constantly under scrutiny.

 

 

About: Prince Ibenne. (Nigeria) Prince is passionate about helping people understand the crypto-verse through his easily digestible articles. He is an enthusiastic supporter of blockchain technology and cryptocurrency. Find me at my Markethive Profile Page | My Twitter Account | and my LinkedIn Profile.

 

 

 

 

 

Tim Moseley

UK to implement first set of crypto regulations in 2024 Spain to implement MiCA in 2025

UK to implement first set of crypto regulations in 2024, Spain to implement MiCA in 2025

The government of the U.K. has completed its review of comments received from the public regarding its proposed regulatory regime for crypto assets and has decided to move forward with implementing the first set of rules to regulate the crypto sector, including a requirement that all market participants be authorized before they can offer services to customers.

HM Treasury released the government’s responses to the comments received from the public on Monday, saying, “The government’s ambition to make the UK a global hub for cryptoasset technologies remains steadfast.”

“To realize this ambition, we must make the UK a place where cryptoasset firms have the clarity needed to invest and innovate, and where customers have the protections necessary for confidently using these technologies,” said Andrew Griffith, economic secretary to the Treasury.

“The learnings gathered from our engagement have been invaluable for further informing our approach,” he added. “While most aspects of our proposals were well received by the large majority of respondents, we have modified certain features of our future framework to take onboard the evidence presented.”

The Treasury said it would move ahead as proposed in a February public consultation, requiring firms undertaking cryptoasset activities to be authorized by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), although it gave no start date.

“By and large, the government intends to implement the territorial scope of the future regulatory regime as proposed in the Consultation,” they said. “This means a person (whether legal or natural) will generally be required to be authorized by the FCA under Part 4A of FSMA if they are undertaking one of the regulated activities or are providing a service in or to the UK.”

The rules that the Treasury intends to enforce focus on crypto assets like Bitcoin (BTC), the underlying blockchain technology that underpins the sector, and providers that are looking to offer crypto asset services to the U.K. public.

Regulated activities include offering a cryptoasset, operating a trading platform, swapping cryptoassets for currencies such as sterling, arranging investments and lending in cryptoassets, and safekeeping or custody.

“The government’s position is that firms dealing directly with UK retail consumers should be required to be authorized irrespective of where they are located,” they said.

The ministry said the new rules will be brought under established market law rather than exist as a standalone regime.

"It’s unlikely that crypto regulation will be easily shoe-horned into the existing regulatory framework," said Jonathan Cavill, a lawyer at Pinsent Masons. "The reality is that as the market develops at pace, the UK runs the risk of being left behind if it fails to attract crypto businesses."

The ministry said it plans to accelerate the implementation of these rules to provide the sector with greater clarity and will present secondary legislation to parliament in 2024. They also released a separate document outlining their approach to regulating stablecoins and will propose legislation in 2024 to give the FCA powers to oversee them.

The decision to move forward with establishing regulations around digital assets comes on the heels of the June passage of the Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) legislation in the European Union, which is the world’s first set of comprehensive rules specifically for cryptoasset markets.

  Singapore, Japan, Switzerland, and the U.K. partner on digital asset pilot programs

Spain to implement MiCA ahead of schedule

The Spanish Ministry of Economy and Digital Transformation has announced that it will begin implementing MiCA at the national level in December 2025, six months before the July 2026 general deadline for implementing the crypto framework for all 27 member states of the E.U.

The Ministry made the announcement via a press release on Thursday, and the first vice president of Spain, Nadia Calviño, has since met with the president of the European Securities and Market Authority, Verena Ross, to discuss the government’s intention to advance the implementation of MiCA.

While MiCA was approved in June, E.U. countries have been given a 36-month transition period from the time the bill was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Spain previously stated they wanted to shorten that transition period to 18 months.

"The government will shorten the transitional period of application … with the aim of creating a predictable and stable regulatory and supervisory framework," the release from the Ministry said. “[This] will provide legal certainty and greater protection for Spanish investors in this type of assets.”

But they are not waiting until 2025 to start their preparations, as multiple large international crypto exchanges in Spain have been granted local licenses. In June, Crypto.com announced that they had been granted a Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) registration from the Banco de España that allows the exchange to operate in the country.

In September, Coinbase secured an anti-money laundering compliance registration from Spain’s central bank, and Kraken attained a VASP registration similar to Crypto.com.

Earlier this month, Banco de España issued a note to Spanish citizens preparing them for the potential introduction of a digital euro and explaining the basics of how the European Union’s central bank digital currency (CBDC) would operate.

“These preparations are multiple and complex in nature, not only for the Eurosystem but also for legislators,” they said. “The objective is clear: to be able to complement the range of payment solutions available to citizens, including cash. The digital euro would be an additional option that would ensure access to public money with all its guarantees, also in an increasingly digital environment.”

“The infrastructure that allows us to make electronic payments (machines, connections, protocols …) is a key part of our financial system and the Eurosystem ensures its soundness and availability,” the central bank said. “The digital euro would be based on a public and European infrastructure that would strengthen the European financial system and make it more independent of foreign alternatives.”

By

Jordan Finneseth

For Kitco News

Time to Buy Gold and Silver

Tim Moseley

China’s gold output consumption rise in 2023 gold ETFs add 953 tonnes in Q3

China's gold output, consumption rise in 2023, gold ETFs add 9.53 tonnes in Q3

China’s gold production and consumption both increased over the first nine months of 2023, while the country’s gold ETFs also saw significant inflows in the third quarter, according to a report from Xinhua.

“China produced 271.248 tonnes of gold in the first nine months of 2023, up 1.261 tonnes or 0.47 percent compared with the same period last year,” the report said, citing data released by the China Gold Association (CGA). “In the January-September period, gold consumption in China totaled 835.07 tonnes, up 7.32 percent year on year.”

The CGA data also revealed a rise in the consumption of gold jewelry and gold bars and coins in the Chinese market. “Consumption of gold jewelry in the Chinese market rose 5.72 percent year on year to 552.04 tonnes, while that of gold bars and coins surged 15.98 percent from the same period in 2022 to 222.37 tonnes,” they said.

However, not all sectors saw an increase in gold consumption. “During the period, consumption of gold for industrial and other use fell 5.53 percent from a year earlier to 60.66 tonnes,” the report said.

The third quarter also witnessed significant inflows to the holdings of Chinese gold-backed exchange-traded funds. “In the third quarter alone, holdings of gold-backed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in China added 9.53 tonnes,” the CGA said.

This addition brought the total holdings of gold ETFs in the Chinese market to about 59.69 tonnes by the end of September.

According to a recent report from Vladimir Zernov, Market Analyst at FX Empire, China is selling off massive quantities of its U.S. assets, and has little choice but to reallocate the funds to gold.

Zernov said he believes gold is one of the few viable alternatives to U.S. Treasuries. “In this scenario, China could increase its gold purchases in the upcoming months,” he wrote.

According to recent data from the U.S. Treasury, Chinese investors sold $21.2 billion worth of U.S. assets in the month of August. “While Fed policy outlook was the biggest driver behind the sell-off in Treasuries, it looks that China’s activity contributed to the move that pushed the yield of 30-year Treasuries towards 5.00%,” he wrote.

Zernov said he believes that, contrary to the prevailing market view, high Treasury yields may actually serve as an additional bullish catalyst for gold. “Traders are searching for safe-haven assets due to geopolitical tensions,” he wrote. “Treasuries are considered to be among the safest assets in the world, but their price is falling for months, and some investors may choose to buy gold.”

Chinese investors may be among the first ones to redeploy their funds to gold markets, he said.

Recent gold purchase data supports the theory that China is moving heavily into gold as they move to liquidate U.S. debt, with the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) buying gold at a torrid pace.

According to updated foreign reserve data, China’s central bank bought 29 tonnes of gold in August, lifting year-to-date purchases to 155 tonnes. It was also the central bank's biggest purchase since December.

And it’s not just the Chinese state that’s shown a voracious appetite for the yellow metal. Recent months have seen China’s domestic gold prices spike well above international spot prices as the country’s wealthy and middle class have clamored to secure the value of their own savings.

The population’s desire for gold was so great that the PBoC intervened in the market by banning banks from importing gold, which pushed the spread between the spot price of gold in Shanghai and in London to a record $121 per ounce in mid-September.

By

Ernest Hoffman

For Kitco News

Time to Buy Gold and Silver

Tim Moseley

The Artist that came out of the Winter